The Herald reports on a teacher who had an affair with a student as being allowed to teach in a school not far from the one she was teaching at before. Someone points out the apparent double standard
One believed she should never have been allowed to teach again, and that a male teacher would have been “lynched”.
Does this mean that failure to register as a teacher is not grounds to prevent a person from being a teacher? I can only think that the reason they haven’t clamped down on her is because the lack of registration is still a widespread problem. At some stage, somebody did not ask for a teacher registration number and just assumed everything was alright.
And actually, it is possible to “understand” why this happened. I remember a story where a teenager got off relatively lightly because he didn’t have a driver’s license. You can’t impose license restrictions on somebody who doesn’t have a license.
Posted by ivorytowerkiwi 